ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE, PEDAGOGY,
CRITICAL THINKING, CREATIVITY AND PERFORMING ARTS.
"Another world is not only possible.
She is on her way.
On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing."
- Arundhati Roy
Why do I call my blog Medusa’s mind?
A, because all literary discussions refer only to Medusa’s head but never her mind as if prompted by a natural presumption that Medusa would not have a mind or even if she did, it was not necessary to talk about her mind as it was to talk about her head considering the spectacle she offered. B, because my mind resembles Medusa’s a bit as serpent like thoughts seem to spring out of them all the time at any given moment. C, because I am in love with the spectacle called Medusa and the writhing snakes in her head which to me represent an extreme projection of a patriarchal anxiety of a woman with a potential mind and not just a body, an urgent need to render ugly and venomous and vicious the mind of a woman and then mythicise it through a repulsive yet fascinating graphic so that it has a permanent imprint on the collective unconscious of an entire community. Drawing attention to her head to distract attention from her mind. Or perhaps conflating the figurative ‘evil’ head with the metaphorical ‘evil’ mind implying any woman who is capable of thinking is apparently ‘evil’ and a threat to society.
Medusa wasn’t always like this. She was turned into a gorgon by Athena after she was raped by Poseidon. How different was it then from now? A woman subjected to anything ranging from censure to damnation and having to pay in addition to being raped, chastised and shamed by other women. Medusa also had the ability to turn people to stone, in other words literally petrify people. People who had one look at her turned to stone, so terrifying was her semblance. Were they terrified because of her ugliness or because she was different? Who decides what is ugly and repulsive, what is desirable and beautiful? Value assignment is a cultural exercise engineered through religious, mythological and folk narratives. A serpent is venomous but that venom acquires an attribute of a certain viciousness only through a human exercise of value judgment, through a perception that is subjective and therefore biased.
Poets, writers, artists and philosophers have had a long standing relation with Medusa. They are at once fascinated and repulsed by her. Attracted and terrified at the same time. Ugly or otherwise the serpents writhing and crawling on her head bespeak activity and movement suggesting a mind that is alive and if one were to extend the serpent metaphor, also a mind that can attack and resist and also sting if need be.
So Perseuses are created to behead the Medusas of the world, to rid the world of such contumelious and malevolent women. Does the act of Perseus beheading Medusa but retaining her head as a fancy weapon to terrify adversaries say anything about the politics of owning and appropriating? It could be read as laying claim over a woman’s mind or appropriating what was truly and originally her strength and prowess or subduing a woman different from her creed?
So coming back to Medusa’s mind, there could be thoughts that manifest themselves in this blog that are not exactly savoury or palatable, that might antagonise some and terrify others because they contest and challenge the given and the acceptable. But they will surely fascinate, impelling one to go beyond the agonising exterior of the gorgon realising it as a mask, symbolic of an arrested trauma and reconcile with reflections, opinions and musings that are off the beaten track.
Julia Kristeva and the Abject Shit, sewage, slime, vomit, an infection, a corpse, rotten food: what do all these words mean to us? Do they provoke us in some way, do they disgust us? Definitely so. But why do we experience this natural sense of disgust when we encounter these words or the ideas they represent, let along encounter them actually? These are what the Bulgarian French philosopher Julia Kristeva calls the ‘abject’. At a very basic level, if we want to understand the abject, let......
Writing as a Woman Most feminists seem ambivalent and reluctant to take a position either in favour or against writing as a woman or having their work classified as writing by women. On the one hand, it can be fairly argued that writing from the conscious subject position of a woman might lend the writer a vision that is unique and sensitive, so a vision marked by gender or some other particularity like race or class for instance, need not always necessarily be undesirable. On the other hand,......
In her talk, Toril Moi reflects over why there was a sudden ebb and disinterest in the history of feminist theory towards theorising women’s writing; in other words, she investigates the sudden lack of interest by feminist theoreticians in their enterprise to evolving a feminist aesthetics of literature by women. Even as theorists like Helene Cixous were breaking new ground with the idea of ecriture feminine or writing by women arguing that women ought to subvert literary paternity by......
Baudrillard’s theory of simulation is most fascinating and profoundly relevant and crucial to understanding today’s times. Baudrillard argues that we live in a state of simulated reality. In effect, we do not have an access to reality so we have always adopted frameworks to access, approach, understand and make sense of reality. With the advent of media, the representation of reality has gone to a totally different level. This world, is made comprehensible to us now by the projections on......